Press ESC to close

Advance of ₹76k Withheld After Tour Cancellation by SOTC

  • September 22, 2025
  • (0)

A traveler booked a Kenya Safari tour through SOTC/Thomas Cook (Mumbai) by paying an advance of ₹76,000 against a quoted package of ₹3.49 lakh. Soon after, SOTC revoked the agreed dates, proposed alternate dates at higher cost, and later revealed that part of the advance was treated as a “processing fee” which was not disclosed at the time of payment.

When the traveler declined the revised terms, SOTC refused to refund the advance. Despite repeated follow-ups, emails, calls, and even a complaint through the National Consumer Helpline, the refund was not issued. The company maintained that a conditional email from the customer amounted to acceptance, ignoring later communications.

Legal advice suggested the customer could win in consumer court, but the time, cost, and appeals process outweighed the refund value. Outcome: loss of ₹76,000 and a highly frustrating service experience.

Lessons & Advice for Others

  • Get everything in writing: Confirm trip dates, package price, inclusions, and refund terms before paying.
  • Demand a full breakup: Insist on a cost breakdown and clarity on any “processing fees.”
  • Set SLAs upfront: Agree on timelines for visas, tickets, or special requirements before making payment.
  • Be cautious with revised offers: If a company revokes an offer, ask for written confirmation before considering alternatives.
  • Check reputation: Speak to friends, family, or colleagues about their past experiences with the agency.
  • Prefer direct payments: Pay directly to the company, not third-party gateways, to avoid disputes later.
  • Amount paid: ₹76,000
  • Date: September 2023
  • Evidence: Claimed
  • Sources: Source
  • Actions tried: Consumer court
  • Outcome: Lost
  • City: Mumbai
  • Sector: Ecommerce, Travel
  • Trap Type: Undisclosed Processing Fees
  • Organization: SOTC
Disclaimer: TrapWatch is a people-powered archive of hidden costs, scams, and everyday pitfalls. Stories may be submitted by community members or curated by our team from social media and other public sources. While we moderate for fairness and privacy, we do not independently verify or endorse individual claims. Please treat these as personal experiences or reports, not established facts. Always use your own judgment, cross-check information, and seek independent confirmation or professional advice before acting on anything you read here.

Story

A traveler booked a Kenya Safari tour through SOTC/Thomas Cook (Mumbai) by paying an advance of ₹76,000 against a quoted package of ₹3.49 lakh. Soon after, SOTC revoked the agreed dates, proposed alternate dates at higher cost, and later revealed that part of the advance was treated as a “processing fee” which was not disclosed at the time of payment.

When the traveler declined the revised terms, SOTC refused to refund the advance. Despite repeated follow-ups, emails, calls, and even a complaint through the National Consumer Helpline, the refund was not issued. The company maintained that a conditional email from the customer amounted to acceptance, ignoring later communications.

Legal advice suggested the customer could win in consumer court, but the time, cost, and appeals process outw

Quick Facts

  • Date: 20230901
  • Amount paid: ₹76000

Actions Tried

  • consumer_court